I really enjoy reading your blog, it always has great insight. But I am very frustrated with the media’s lack of questions to the presidential candidates about global warming.
The Daily Green just put an article out talking about how the presidential candidates are not being asked where they stand on the issue of the climate change – this is surprising to me considering its such a MAJOR concern to people. I just saw a poll on http://www.EarthLab.com that says people care a lot what their next leader thinks about global warming (after you take it they show you the results). Does anyone know of another poll or other results about this subject?
If not, go to http://www.earthlab.com/life.aspx and take their poll to see which way the results go. This is a pretty legit website; they are endorsed by Al Gore and the alliance for climate protection and they have a carbon footprint calculator. No matter which political party you vote for this is an important issue for our environment, our economy and for homeland security.
I certainly agree with you on the issue of global warming. Although we are heading in the right direction, I’m afraid a movement to change the conventional thought process in Washington will be seen only on a gradual scale.
As the national politics drift back toward the left, I think this type of discussion will become more relevant and and generally accepted among the population.
Who knows, perhaps the next administration will help usher in an energy independent agenda and play a more urgent leadership role. From the way things look heading into 2008, we are surely due for a moderate or left leaning President.
Sign Up for JutiaGroup Underground and Receive Handpicked Stories Delivered to Your Inbox
Productivity is the measure of real growth in wealth in a nation. If government creates money it must be backed ... James | 6Nov09 | More
Those who insist inflation is a result of too much paper chasing too few goods can take a lesson from ... James | 6Nov09 | More
Dear Dr. Eifrig,
Anarchist's Retirement. I have followed your advive through Daily Wealth and visited our s.s. office twice and ... alan wagner | 5Nov09 | More
John:
Why doesn't the Treasury just create its own bank - and do exactly the same thing, but keep the 15-20% ... Loki in Toronto | 4Nov09 | More
*LOL*
Hey, why don't you do the same comparison for the 2000 and 2004 elections? Show which were doing just ... Scott_T | 30Oct09 | More
I followed Agricultural stocks since immediately following the crash.
I followed Grain prices since immediately following the crash.
Guess what this article ... Roy | 24Oct09 | More
The problem is not consumption, it's a lack of consumption. What is Jim Rogers looking at? GDP has fallen because ... michael norman | 21Oct09 | More
Wanted to show what happened in the states that flipped from Republican in '04 to Democrat in '08 without making ... Stephen Oakes | 20Oct09 | More
Comment by adrian2514 on 23 January 2008:
I really enjoy reading your blog, it always has great insight. But I am very frustrated with the media’s lack of questions to the presidential candidates about global warming.
The Daily Green just put an article out talking about how the presidential candidates are not being asked where they stand on the issue of the climate change – this is surprising to me considering its such a MAJOR concern to people. I just saw a poll on http://www.EarthLab.com that says people care a lot what their next leader thinks about global warming (after you take it they show you the results). Does anyone know of another poll or other results about this subject?
If not, go to http://www.earthlab.com/life.aspx and take their poll to see which way the results go. This is a pretty legit website; they are endorsed by Al Gore and the alliance for climate protection and they have a carbon footprint calculator. No matter which political party you vote for this is an important issue for our environment, our economy and for homeland security.
Comment by Stephen Oakes on 27 January 2008:
Adrian2514
I certainly agree with you on the issue of global warming. Although we are heading in the right direction, I’m afraid a movement to change the conventional thought process in Washington will be seen only on a gradual scale.
As the national politics drift back toward the left, I think this type of discussion will become more relevant and and generally accepted among the population.
Who knows, perhaps the next administration will help usher in an energy independent agenda and play a more urgent leadership role. From the way things look heading into 2008, we are surely due for a moderate or left leaning President.